Air Quality at Heathrow Airport 2018 - Issue 1

Annual Report for 2018

Authors	Joanne Green
Compilation date	15 April 2019
Customer	Heathrow Airport Ltd
Approved by	Brian Stacey
Copyright	Ricardo Energy & Environment
EULA	http://ee.ricardo.com/cms/eula/

Contract reference

ED12559

Report reference

ED12559 V1

Executive summary

This report provides details of air quality monitoring conducted around Heathrow Airport during 2018. The work, carried out by Ricardo Energy & Environment on behalf of Heathrow Airport Ltd (HAL), is a continuation of monitoring undertaken at Heathrow Airport since 1993. The aims of the programme are to monitor air pollution around the airport, to assess compliance with relevant national air quality objectives, and to investigate changes in air pollutant concentrations over time.

Automatic continuous monitoring was carried out at four locations on behalf of HAL, referred to as LHR2, London Harlington, Green Gates and Oaks Road. Data from these four continuous monitoring stations, as well as 21 other continuous monitors operated by Hillingdon, Hounslow, Slough, Spelthorne, and Defra are shared and summarised on heathrowairwatch.org.uk.

LHR2 is located on the northern apron, between the airport boundary and the northern runway (grid reference 508400 176750), London Harlington is located at the Imperial College Sports Ground (508299 177809), Green Gates is located near the north western airport perimeter (505630 176930) and Oaks Road, on a residential location to the south west (505740 174500).

All sites monitored oxides of nitrogen (nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide) and Particulate Matter (PM₁₀ and PM_2.5). PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 data for all sites in 2018 was measured using FIDAS instruments.

Ozone measurements were undertaken at London Harlington and Black Carbon (BC) monitoring was undertaken at LHR2 and Oaks Road using aethalometer instruments.

The minimum applicable data capture target of 90% (from the European Commission Air Quality Directive) was achieved for all instruments at all stations except the black carbon analyser at LHR2.

The UK AQS hourly mean objective for NO₂ is 200 μg m^-3, with no more than 18 exceedances allowed each year. There were no excceedances of this objective at any of the sites during 2018.

The annual mean AQS objective for NO₂ is 40 μg m^-3. This was met at Harlington, Green Gates and Oaks Road. At LHR2, an annual mean of 43 μg m^-3 was registered for 2018. This value is slightly lower than those registered in the last three years, showing a small decrease in concentrations for this pollutant, however, similar decreases were also observed throughout the south-east and London. The AQS objectives and EU limit values do not apply for this site, since LHR2 is located within the airport perimeter fence, where members of the public do not have access.

PM₁₀ may exceed the 24-hour mean limit of 50 μg m^-3 no more than 35 times per year to meet the AQS objective. There was only one exceedance of the 50 μg m^-3 24h mean value at LHR2, Green Gates and Oaks Road with concentrations of 65, 66 and 64 μg m^-3 respectively. This AQS objective was therefore met for all HAL sites. The annual mean AQS target for PM₁₀ is 40 μg m^-3. This objective was met at all the monitoring stations.

The AQS objective for daily maximum on an 8 hour running mean is of 100 μg m^-3 (not to be exceeded more than 10 days a year). Harlington exceeded the AQS objective for ozone on 18 days during 2018. This was driven by regional episodes during the summer months.

Average concentrations of NO, NO₂, PM₁₀, PM_2.5 and O₃ at the Heathrow sites were generally comparable to those measured at urban background air pollution monitoring sites in London except for NO₂ concentrations at LHR2 which were more elevated than urban background locations.

The pattern of monthly averaged concentrations throughout the year showed that concentrations of the primary pollutant NO were typically highest in the winter months. NO₂, which has both primary and secondary components, showed a similar pattern. PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 showed a much less pronounced seasonal pattern, which is quite common for particulates in urban areas, with peks in March and November coinciding with regional episodes. Ozone (measured at Harlington only) showed higher concentrations in the spring and summer. This is a typical seasonal pattern for ozone, which is formed from other pollutants in the presence of sunlight.

Wind speed direction data measured at the LHR2 location were used to investigate effects on pollutant concentrations and potential sources at all four sites. Bivariate plots of pollutant concentration indicated that nearby sources, such as the perimeter road, were probably the main source of NO. There were also moderate NO concentrations at greater wind speeds from the south west measured at LHR2. With regards to NO₂, there also appeared to be a contribution from the south south west at higher wind speeds, possibly indicating a major source further away, in this direction are: Terminal 5 and the Central Terminal Area (CTA). For both PM₁₀ and PM_2.5, high concentrations were dominated by the regional episodes which brought polluted air masses from the east. Bivariate plots of Black Carbon data indicate readings were higher under calmer conditions suggesting local emission sources were probably the main source.

Several high pollution episodes occurred during 2018. At all sites, particularly high concentrations of PM₁₀ were recorded around 3^rd March and 22^nd November. Local emissions, combined with trans-boundary emissions from continental Europe, in conjunction with weather conditions are the origin of these high concentration episodes. There was also a long running period of Moderate to High ozone concentrations between 23^rd June and 27^th July across the region.

In the long term, annual mean concentrations of NO appear to show a general decrease over the past decade at LHR (although there is considerable year-to-year fluctuation). The trend for NO₂ overall suggests a small decrease in concentrations over the last ten years. The proportion of NOx measured as NO₂ has increased over the last decade, the decrease in 2016 has been reversed a small amount by a slight increase in 2017 and again in 2018. The annual mean concentrations of PM₁₀ have remained similar to last year. A slight decrease in long term trends can be seen in the PM data as a result of new analysers being installed in 2014. Annual means are generally consistent with those measured at other sites in London, excluding PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 which recorded lower annual averages than the comparison sites located in London. The long ozone episode measured in 2018 has seen an increase in the annual mean at Harlington and across London. The long term profile is still one of a slow increase in concentrations, likely due to its relationship with nitrogen oxides as well as recent hot summers.

Although the airport is a material contributor to local air pollutant concentrations, there appears to be no relationship between air traffic movements and ambient pollutant concentrations, either on a seasonal or long-term basis. This indicates that variations in ambient concentration are mainly driven by other factors (such as variations in meteorological conditions and emissions from non-airport sources such as road transport and stationary combustion processes). Air quality in the wider region can also be significantly influenced by long-range trans-boundary air pollution.

1 Introduction

1.1 Background

Heathrow Airport is the world’s busiest 2-runway international airport, handling just over 80 million passengers in 2018 (Travel Stats, 2018). The airport is situated approximately 12 miles to the west of Central London, but within the general urbanised area of Greater London.

Airports are potentially significant sources of many air pollutants. Aircraft jet engines emit pollutants including oxides of nitrogen (NO_x), carbon monoxide (CO), oxides of sulphur (SO_x), particulate matter, hydrocarbons from partially combusted fuel, and other trace compounds. There are also pollutant emissions from the airside vehicles, and from the large number of road vehicles travelling to and from the airport each day. Also, Heathrow Airport is situated in an urban area, containing many domestic, commercial and industrial sources of pollution.

Heathrow Airport Ltd therefore carries out monitoring of ambient air quality at four sites around the airport: on the northern apron near the perimeter and northern runway (LHR2), and outside the airport boundary at Harlington, Green Gates and Oaks Road.

The following pollutants are monitored at these sites:

• Oxides of nitrogen (nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO₂));
• Particulate matter (PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 fractions);
• Ozone (O₃) (Harlington);
• Black Carbon (BC) (LHR2 and Oaks Road).

LHR2 also records meteorological data.

Ricardo Energy & Environment was contracted by Heathrow Airport Ltd (HAL) to carry out the required programme of air pollution measurements during 2018, the 26th continuous year of monitoring, and this report presents and summarises the fully validated and quality controlled dataset for the period 1st January to 31st December 2018.

In addition to this report, HAL has daily access to provisional data from its monitoring sites via their own Heathrow Airwatch website (Heathrow Airwatch, 2019) and data from the UK’s national air quality monitoring network, through the Defra UK Air Information Resource (UK-AIR) (Defra_4, 2019).

Data in the annual report have been processed according to the rigorous quality assurance and quality control procedures used by Ricardo Energy & Environment. These ensure the data are reliable, accurate and traceable to UK national measurement standards.

1.2 Aims and objectives

The aim of this monitoring programme is to monitor concentrations of several important air pollutants around the airport. The results of the monitoring are used to assess whether applicable national air quality objectives have been met, and how pollutant concentrations in the area have changed over time. Additionally, meteorological data were used to investigate the importance of various sources of pollution.

It is important to note that the pollutants measured in this study will have originated from a wide variety of sources, both local and long range. Not all of these sources will be directly connected with the airport.

Monitoring data collected at Heathrow are compared in this report with:

• Relevant UK air quality limit values and objectives.
• Corresponding results from a selection of national air pollution monitoring sites.
• Statistics related to airport activity.

In addition, periods of relatively high pollutant concentrations are examined in more detail.

1.3 UK Air Quality Strategy

Within the European Union, controls on ambient air quality are covered by Directive 2008/50/EC (EC_1, 2008), and its update EU Directive 2015/1480 (EC_2, 2015), known as the Air Quality Directive. This consolidated three previously existing Directives, which set limit values for a range of air pollutants with known health impacts. The original Directives were transposed into UK law through The Environment Act 1995 which placed a requirement on the Secretary of State for the Environment to produce a national Air Quality Strategy (AQS) containing standards, objectives and measures for improving ambient air quality.

The Environment Act 1995 also introduced the system of local air quality management (LAQM). This requires local authorities to review and assess air quality in their areas against the national air quality objectives. Where any objective is unlikely to be met by the relevant deadline, the local authority must designate an air quality management area (AQMA). Local authorities then have a duty to carry out further assessments within any AQMAs and draw up an action plan specifying the measures to be carried out, and the timescales, to achieve the air quality objectives. The legal framework given in the Environment Act has been adopted in the UK through the UK AQS. The most recent version of the AQS was published by Defra in 2007, and the currently applicable air quality objectives are summarised in Appendix 1 of this report. Figure 1 shows a map of Hillingdon AQMA.

Figure 1: Map of Hillingdon AQMA

2 Air quality monitoring

2.1 Pollutants Monitored

2.1.1 Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

Combustion processes emit a mixture of oxides of nitrogen, NO and NO₂ - collectively termed NOx.

1. NO is described as a primary pollutant (meaning it is directly emitted from source). NO is not known to have any harmful effects on human health at ambient concentrations. However, it undergoes oxidation in the atmosphere to form the secondary pollutant NO₂.

2. NO₂ has a primary (directly emitted) component and a secondary component, formed by oxidation of NO. NO₂ is a respiratory irritant and is toxic at high concentrations. It is also involved in the formation of photochemical smog and acid rain and may cause damage to crops and vegetation.

Of the NOx emissions (including NO₂) considered to be airport-related, over 50 % arise from aircraft during take-off and landing, with around two-thirds of all emissions occurring at some distance from airport ground-level. The Air Quality Expert Group (AQEG) (Air Quality Expert Group, 2004) has stated that: Around a third of all NOx emissions from the aircraft (including ground-level emissions from auxiliary power units, engine testing etc., as well as take-off and landing) occur below 100 m in height. The remaining two-thirds occur between 100 m and 1000 m and contribute little to ground-level concentrations. Receptor modelling studies show the impact of airport activities on ground-level NO₂ concentrations. Studies have shown that although emissions associated with road traffic are smaller than those associated with aircraft, their impact on population exposure at locations around the airport are larger. Previous rounds of review and assessment within the LAQM process have not highlighted any cases where airports appear to have caused exceedances of air quality objectives for particulate matter measured as PM₁₀. Therefore, in the context of LAQM, the key pollutant of concern from airports is NO₂. Local authorities whose areas contain airports with over 10 million passengers per annum must take these into account in their annual review and assessment of air quality.

2.1.2 Particulate matter

Airborne particulate matter varies widely in its physical and chemical composition, source and particle size. The terms PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 are used to describe particles with an effective size with a median aerodynamic diameter of 10 and 2.5 nm respectively. These are of greatest concern with regard to human health, as they are small enough to penetrate deep into the lungs. They can cause inflammation and a worsening of the condition of people with heart and lung diseases. In addition, they may carry surface absorbed carcinogenic compounds into the lungs. Larger particles, meanwhile, are not readily inhaled, and are removed relatively efficiently from the air by sedimentation.

The main sources of airborne particulate matter in the UK are combustion (industrial, commercial and residential fuel use). The next most significant source is road vehicle emissions. Based on 2015 NAEI data, less than 0.1% of UK total PM₁₀ emissions are believed to originate from civil aircraft taking off and landing (Defra_3, 2017).

Previous rounds of review and assessment within the LAQM process have not highlighted any cases where airports appear to have caused exceedances of air quality objectives for particulate matter measured as PM₁₀.

2.1.3 Ozone (O₃)

Ozone (O₃) is not emitted directly into the atmosphere in significant quantities, but is a secondary pollutant produced by reaction between nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) and hydrocarbons, in the presence of sunlight. Whereas nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) contributes to ozone formation, nitrogen oxide (NO) destroys ozone and therefore acts as a local sink. For this reason, ozone levels are not as high in urban areas (where NO is emitted from vehicles) as in rural areas. Ozone levels are usually highest in rural areas, particularly in hot, still, sunny weather conditions giving rise to “summer smog”.

2.1.4 Black Carbon (BC)

Black Carbon (BC) is the strongest light-absorbing component of particulate matter. It is a primary aerosol, emitted directly at the source, as a result of incomplete combustion of fossil fuels (automobile exhaust, industrial and power plant exhaust, aircraft emissions, etc.) and biomass burning (burning of agricultural wastes, forest fires). Therefore, much of atmospheric BC is of anthropogenic origin. Exposure to BC is of great concern with regard to human health due to its small size, typically finer than PM_2.5. It has been linked to health impacts such as cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality, cancer and respiratory diseases. Reductions in exposure to particles containing BC will consequently reduce such adverse health impacts.

2.2 Monitoring sites and methods

Automatic monitoring was carried out at four sites during 2018. These are referred to as LHR2, London Harlington, Green Gates and Oaks Road. The location descriptions of the sites fall into the category “other” as defined by the Defra Technical Guidance on air quality monitoring LAQM.TG(09) (Defra_2, 2016), (i.e. any special source-oriented or location category covering monitoring undertaken in relation to specific emission sources such as power stations, car-parks, airports or tunnels).

The pollutants that were monitored at each monitoring site are shown in Table 1. The LHR2 site has been in operation since 1993; the Harlington site commenced in 2003. The Green Gates and Oaks Road sites were originally set up for monitoring in connection with the Terminal 5 Construction Impact Assessment in 2001, but were retained at the conclusion of this project, as part of the ongoing monitoring programme from 2007 onwards. Figure 2 shows a map of the locations of all monitoring sites used in this study. The map can be zoomed in and out and more information on the monitoring sites can be obtained from clicking on the marker.

Figure 2: Locations of the Heathrow air monitoring sites

Figure 3 shows the LHR2 monitoring site. This is located on an area of the old apron between the northern runway and the northern perimeter road, 14.5 m from the kerb and 179 m from the runway centre. The prevailing wind direction is from the south west and hence this site, situated to the north east of the airport, was selected to monitor air pollutants arising from the airport area. The EU limit values and AQS objectives only apply to locations where public exposure may occur. As LHR2 is located within the airport perimeter, where members of the public do not have access, these limits do not apply.

Figure 3: Heathrow LHR2 air quality monitoring site

Figure 4 shows the Harlington site. This was established to measure air pollution concentrations in residential areas close to the airport. The site is located in the grounds of the Imperial College Sports Ground, approximately 1 km north of LHR2 and 300 m from the western edge of Harlington. Since 1st January 2004, the site has been part of the Defra Automatic Urban and Rural Network (AURN), and meets the Air Quality Directive siting criteria. Because the site is part of the national network, it is classified according to the site types defined in the Air Quality Directive: its classification of Urban Industrial reflects the presence of the airport.

Figure 4: London Harlington air quality monitoring site

Figure 5 shows the Green Gates site. This site is close to Bath Road, which runs along the northern perimeter of the airport.

Figure 5: Green Gates air quality monitoring site

Figure 6 shows the Heathrow Oaks Road site. This site is located in a residential area near to the south western boundary of the airport and is classified as an urban industrial site. Both Green Gates and Oaks Road meet the Directive criteria for urban industrial sites.

Figure 6: Oaks Road air quality monitoring site

2.3 Automatic monitoring

The following techniques were used for the automatic monitoring of NOx (i.e. NO and NO₂), PM, O₃ and Black Carbon (BC):

• PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 - Fine Dust Analysis Systems (FIDAS);
• NO, NO₂ - Chemiluminescence;
• O₃ - UV absorption analyser;
• BC - Aethalometer.

Further information on these techniques is provided in Appendix 2 of this report. These analysers provide a continuous output, proportional to the pollutant concentration. This output is recorded and stored every 10 seconds, and averaged to 15-minute mean values by internal data loggers. The analysers are connected to a modem and interrogated through a GPRS internet device to download the data to Ricardo Energy & Environment. Data are downloaded hourly. The data are converted to concentration units at Ricardo Energy & Environment then averaged to hourly mean concentrations.

3 Quality assurance and data capture

3.1 Quality assurance and Quality control

In line with current operational procedures within the Defra Automatic Urban and Rural Network (AURN)(Defra_1, 2009), full intercalibration audits of the HAL air quality monitoring sites take place at six-monthly intervals with audit of the ozone analyser every 3 months. In addition all analysers are serviced every 6 months at which time an inlet clean is also undertaken. Full details of these UKAS-accredited calibrations, together with data validation and ratification procedures, are given in Appendix 3 of this report. In addition to instrument and calibration standard checking, the air intake sampling systems were cleaned and all other aspects of site infrastructure were checked.

Following the instrument and calibration gas checking, and the subsequent scaling and ratification of the data, the overall accuracy and precision figures for the pollutants monitored at Heathrow are summarised in Table 2.

4 Results and discussion

4.1 Summary statistics

Overall data capture statistics along with summary statistics for the four monitoring sites are provided in Tables 3 to 7 below. The data capture statistic represents the percentage of valid data measured for the whole reporting period. A data capture target of 90% is recommended in the European Commission Air Quality Directive⁴ and Defra Technical Guidance is 85% LAQM.TG (16) (Defra_2, 2016). This is particularly important at Harlington, as data from this site feed into the Automatic Urban and Rural Network (AURN), the UK’s main network used for compliance reporting against the Ambient Air Quality Directives. In 2018, data capture for all pollutants at all sites, except for black carbon at LHR2, was above the 90% data capture requirement. As highlighted in Table 8 there were a number of mechanical faults with the black carbon analyser during the period February to March and May to July which resulted in the lower data capture rate. The second period of issues resulted in the instrument being returned to the manufacturer. A spare instrument was sought and was installed on 17th July.

NO₂

PM_2.5

PM₁₀

O₃

Black Carbon

Data Gaps

Significant data gaps for periods > 24h for the stations are shown in Table 8.

4.2 Time series plot

Below are time series plots of concentrations of pollutants at the four sites. The particulate plots present daily mean concentrations whilst for NO₂ the plot is presented as hourly concentrations and for ozone as hourly rolling 8-hour mean concentrations. There is one tab per pollutant with all data from the four sites displayed on the chart. Hovering the cursor over the graph will highlight the trace for each monitoring site. It is possible to zoom in on a section of the graph using the sliders below the chart. All sites show the highest peaks in PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 in March and November. These are discussed further below. The elevated peaks of BC occur during the winter months at the end of the year, between October and December, following a typical seasonal pattern. Ozone shows typical seasonal patterns with the highest concentrations recorded during the summer months.The hourly NO₂ peaks look to follow a less seasonal pattern with higher concentrations recorded throughout the year.

NO₂ hourly

PM_2.5

PM₁₀

O₃ rolling 8-hour mean

Black Carbon

4.3 Rolling annual mean

Figures 7 to 9 present the monthly rolling annual mean for NO₂, PM₁₀ and PM_2.5. Rolling annual mean measurements from nearby LA stations are included for additional information.

NO₂

Figure 7: NO₂ 12-month rolling mean for the Heathrow sites from 2008.

PM_2.5

Figure 8: PM_2.5 12-month rolling mean for the Heathrow sites from 2008.

PM₁₀

Figure 9: PM₁₀ 12-month rolling mean for the Heathrow sites from 2008.

4.4 AQ index distribution

The plots below illustrate the distribution of AQ index values for each site by pollutant. It shows the number of days that each site reported concentrations are in each index. More information on the AQ Index is available in Appendix 1 and from UK-Air. During 2018 NO₂ had no periods when the AQI was higher than the Low banding. PM₁₀ concentrations saw some incursopns into the Moderate banding (5 and 6) whilst PM2.5 saw a few days in the Moderate and also one day (at London Harlington) in the High band. Ozone concentrations recorded the most days exceedingt the Low bandings with 18 days of Moderate pollution.

NO₂

Figure 10: Distribution of AQI for NO₂.

PM_2.5

Figure 11: Distribution of AQI for PM_2.5.

PM₁₀

Figure 12: Distribution of AQI for PM₁₀.

O₃

Figure 13: Distribution of AQI for O₃.

4.5 Comparison with air quality objectives

The details of UK air quality standards and objectives specified by Defra are provided in Appendix 1.

During 2018 there were exceedances of the NO₂ annual and the O₃ 8-hour rolling mean limits specified by Defra.

The annual mean AQS objective for NO₂ is 40 μg m^-3. This was met at Harlington, Green Gates and Oaks Road, but not at the LHR2 site, which recorded an annual mean concentration of 43 μg m^-3. Although this value exceeds the AQS objective for NO₂, LHR2 is located within the airport perimeter where members of the public do not have access and so falls into the category “other” as defined by the Defra Technical Guidance on air quality monitoring LAQM.TG (16) (Defra_2, 2016). These sites are defined as: “Any special source-orientated or location category covering monitoring undertaken in relation to specific emission sources such as power stations, car-parks, airports or tunnels” and are located where the public are not exposed.

The AQS objective for hourly mean NO₂ concentration is 200 μg m^-3 which may be exceeded up to 18 times per calendar year. There were no hourly mean NO₂ measurements exceeding 200 μg m^-3 at any of the sites during 2018.

The short term AQS objective for PM₁₀ is a maximum of 50 μg m^-3 for 24h mean periods, not to be exceeded more than 35 times a year. All sites were well within the yearly maximum permitted number of exceedances of 35, thus all meeting the AQS objective for 24 hour mean PM₁₀. However, there was one exceedance of the 50 μg m^-3 24h mean value at LHR2, Green Gates and Oaks Road with concentrations of 65, 66 and 64 μg m^-3 respectively. The annual mean AQS objective for PM₁₀ is 40 μg m^-3. All sites measured average annual values ranging between 14 and 15 μg m^-3, this objective was therefore met.

While no AQS objective exists for PM_2.5, there is an annual mean objective of 25 μg m^-3, although this is a non-mandatory compliance target to be met by 2020. The annual mean for this pollutant for all monitoring locations was between 9 and 10 μg m^-3. This is less than half of the average concentration target limit for 2020.

O₃ was measured at Harlington only. The AQS objective for daily maximum on an 8 hour running mean is of 100 μg m^-3 (not to be exceeded more than 10 days a year). Harlington exceeded the AQS objective for ozone over 84 times over 18 days during 2018. Of these, 11 days occurred between 24th June and 26th July. These exceedances were common at monitoring sites across background and rural sites in the south east and are discussed further in Section 4.6.

Black Carbon was measured at LHR2 and Oaks Road. The highest hourly mean registered was 14 μg m^-3 and 13 μg m^-3 for LHR2 and Oaks Road respectively. The UK Government does not have specific policies to address black carbon and other short lived climate forcers, and therefore, no comparison to a limit can be made. As a proportion of particulate matter is black carbon, action to reduce particle emissions will reduce this pollutant.

4.6 Time variation plot

Figure 10 to Figure 14 below show the variation of monthly, weekly, daily and hourly pollutant concentrations during 2017 at each of the four sites.

Seasonal variation

Seasonal variations can be observed in the ‘month’ plots of the figures below. Elevated concentrations were registered for PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 at all sites in March, May, July and November. The March and November peaks were driven by the two episodes with the highest concentrations during 2018 which are discussed in more detail below. The high average concentration measured in May was due to a large number of days with averages exceeding 30 μg m^-3 but remaining well below the 50 μg m^-3 air quality objective concentration. NO₂ concentrations at all the sites generally follow a typical seasonal variation for urban areas with the highest concentrations occurring during the winter months. This pattern was also observed in previous years and is typical of urban monitoring sites. The highest levels of primary pollutants tend to occur in the winter months, when emissions may be higher, and periods of cold, still weather reduce pollutant dispersion.

O₃ concentrations measured at Harlington continue to follow a typical seasonal variation for this pollutant, with higher concentrations being measured during the summer months. At low/mid latitudes, high O₃ concentrations are generally observed during late spring and/or summer months. This is partly due to predominant anti cyclonic conditions (characterized by warm and dry weather systems) which increase the number of photochemical reactions in the atmosphere, responsible for the increase of ground level ozone production. In addition, the convective fluxes created during hot summer days can also be responsible for an increase of O₃ (stratospheric intrusion). The hot air generated at ground level due to high temperatures is lighter and tends to ascend, being replaced by colder stratospheric air masses coming from above, dragging stratospheric O₃ to ground level as a consequence.

BC data was recorded at LHR2 and Oaks Road sites. The seasonal variation of this pollutant shows in general elevated levels of BC during the winter months. BC is directly related with the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels, it’s likely that during winter and colder periods fuel emissions associated with heating and reduced pollutant dispersion might be the main causes of elevated concentrations of this pollutant. Similar peaks as the ones registered for PM can be seen in May and November for this BC, and are comparable to regional episodes recorded at other UK stations.

Diurnal variation

The diurnal variation analyses viewed in the ‘hour’ plots below show typical urban area daily patterns for NO₂ at all sites. Pronounced peaks can be seen for these pollutants during the mornings, corresponding to rush hour traffic at around 07:00. Concentrations tend to decrease during the middle of the day, with a broader evening road traffic rush-hour peak building up from early afternoon.

O₃ concentrations always increase during daylight hours due to the photochemical reactions of NO₂, VOCs and CO. In the evening and overnight, O₃ gets consumed by a fast reaction with NO (NO titration). The absence of sunlight prevents the photolysis of the O₃ precursors and formation of ozone.

The diurnal patterns for PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 are determined by two main factors. The first is emissions of primary particulate matter, from sources such as vehicles. The second factor is the reaction that occurs between sulphur dioxide, NOx and other chemical species, forming secondary sulphate, nitrate and other particles. Evidence of some morning and afternoon road traffic rush-hour peaks for PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 can be seen at all four sites, but these were less pronounced than those for oxides of nitrogen. The PM₁₀ night time peaks seen at Heathrow LHR2 during 2017 are not evident durign 2018 following completion of the nearby construction works.

BC diurnal variation appears to follow the same trend pattern of NOx with two peaks measured at the same periods (07:00 AM and 20:00 PM) suggesting a strong primary componenet from vehicle exhaust.

Weekly variation

The analyses of the weekly variation for NO₂, PM_2.5, BC and O₃ show that a similar type of diurnal pattern occurs for all the days of the week. NO₂ and BC early morning and late afternoon rush hour peaks are in general much more pronounced during the working week. PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 show the highest concentration are recorded during the Friday evening to Saturday morning period with lowest concentrations occuring on Mondays likely reflecting the pattern of peak airport activity.

NO₂

Figure 14: Temporal variation NO₂.

PM_2.5

Figure 15: Temporal variation PM_2.5.

PM₁₀

Figure 16: Temporal variation PM₁₀.

O₃

Figure 17: Temporal variation O₃.

BC

Figure 18: Temporal variation BC.

4.7 Source investigation

In order to investigate the possible sources of air pollution being monitored around Heathrow Airport, meteorological data measured at LHR2 was used to add a directional component to the air pollutant concentrations.

Figure 19 to Figure 26 show bivariate plots, ‘’pollution roses’’ of hourly mean pollutant concentrations against the corresponding wind speed and wind direction. These plots should be interpreted as follows:

• The wind direction is indicated as in the wind rose above (north, south, east and west are indicated).

• The wind speed is indicated by the distance from the centre of the plot: the concentric circles indicate wind speeds in 5 ms-1 intervals.

• The pollutant concentration is indicated by the colour.

These plots therefore show how pollutant concentration varies with wind direction and wind speed.

NO₂

NO₂:Figure 19 shows the main source of NO₂ at Oaks Road, Green Gates and London Harlington are close to the monitoring site, with the highest concentrations occurring at low wind speeds. Such conditions will have allowed NO₂ emitted from nearby sources (vehicles from nearby roads and within the hotel car parks) to build up, reaching high concentrations. At higher wind speeds, the airport activities look to be the main source at Oaks Road and Green Gates with elevated concentrations occurring at low and moderate wind speeds (around 5-10 m s^-1) from a north easterly and south easterly direction respectively. These might be the result of activities around the airport terminal buildings. Part of this NO₂ may also be created by the reaction between airport emissions of NO with ozone, travelling at increased wind speeds to create a faster reaction.

At LHR2 higher concentrations of NO₂ were associated with two sets of conditions, winds from the north east and easterly direction and from the south west quadrant. This can then be broken down into several sections. Winds from the east brought pollutants from the nearest roads (Bath Road and Northern Perimeter Road and associted junctions) and the built-up area of Harlington. Other high NO₂ concentrations are associated with a wind direction of south west for wind speeds up to 10 ms-1. In this direction the airports departures and arrivals area along with the Central Terminal Area (CTA) can be found.

Figure 19: NO₂ Polar Plot for Heathrow sites

NO

NO:Figure 20 shows that NO concentrations are more heavily influenced by local emissions sources. At Oaks Road, Green Gates and London Harlington almost all higher concentrations are associated with emission of pollutants located close to the site. This will be traffic emissions from the perimeter and other roads. LHR2 shows an additional signature from the north east and south west indicting some emissions from the airport to the south east and both Bath Road and the Northern Perimter Road to the north east.

Figure 20: NO Polar Plot for Heathrow sites

PM_2.5

PM₁₀ and PM_2.5:Figure 21 and Figure 22 show that the sites have very similar, almost identical, plots with high concentrations occuring when the wind is from an easterly direction. To investigate further Figure 23 and Figure 24 present the variation in concentrations as hourly averages plotted by month. This shows that the highest concentrations were measured in March, May and November coinciding with the regional episodes as discussed in Section 4.6. The polar plots are therefore picking up these regional eposides hence the plots are all very similar in nature.

Figure 21: PM_2.5 Polar Plot for Heathrow sites

Figure 23: Average PM2.5 trends by month by site

PM₁₀

PM₁₀ and PM_2.5:Figure 21 and Figure 22 show that the sites have very similar, almost identical, plots with high concentrations occuring when the wind is from an easterly direction. To investigate further Figure 23 and Figure 24 present the variation in concentrations as hourly averages plotted by month. This shows that the highest concentrations were measured in March, May and November coinciding with the regional episodes as discussed in Section 4.6. The polar plots are therefore picking up these regional eposides hence the plots are all very similar in nature.

Figure 22: PM₁₀ Polar Plot for Heathrow sites

Figure 24: Average PM10 trends by month by site

BC

BC: The plots for black carbon show that both sites have registered the highest BC concentrations when wind speed was low, which suggests that the major sources of BC are local, likely local fuel combustion from residential,and local traffic sources. The yellow signature from the SSW at the LHR2 site may be contribution from the biomass boiler at Terminal 2.

Figure 25: BC Polar Plot for Heathrow sites

O₃

Ozone: The pattern for ozone is similar to previous years. Lower ozone levels occur at low wind speeds, which shows that ozone was being scavenged by local emissions, most likely the local traffic sources. High levels of NO caused by the combustion of fossil fuels tend to react rapidly with O₃ to produce NO₂ (destruction of ozone by titration with NO). O₃ levels tend to be higher at high wind speeds, where the effect of local NO emissions is not so well pronounced. The highest ozone concentrations seem to come from the west and south east, for wind speeds above 10 ms^-1.

Figure 26: O₃ Polar Plot for Heathrow sites

4.8 Periods of elevated pollutant concentration

This section reviews the most significant periods of high air pollution concentrations for the whole year. It is important to stress that, despite there being some periods when pollutant concentrations exceeded the applicable air quality objectives, these were attributable to specific external sources. Analysis of episodes are sourced from the London Air Quality Network (Environmental Research Group, 2019) and DAQI maps from UK Air (Defra_4, 2019).

The Air Quality Index presented at the Department of Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra) UK-AIR website. calculates air quality index bands that go from 1 (Low) to 10 (Very High). Several elevated pollution episodes were recorded at Heathrow during 2018. For ozone there was a prolonged period of elevated concentrations around the end of June to the middle of July during a period of prolonged period of hot sunny weather. Over 65% of the total exceedances recorded at London Harlington were measured during this period. The episode started on 23^rd June and ran until July 27^th with only four days ‘low’ air pollution during the 35 day period in London and south east England. The episode included 17 consecutive days of ‘moderate’ ozone, the greatest number of consecutive days since 2008.

The peaks in particulate concentrations measured at the Heathrow sites correspondeded to elevated concentrations for most of the UK regions around the 3^rd March and 22^nd November. These are discussed in more detail below. In addition PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 concentrations were elevated on 5^th of November around the Guy Fawkes celebrations and a ‘Moderate’ air pollution episode 5th-8th May due to an increase in imported emissions from the continent.

Figure 27: DAQI for 3rd March 2018

There was widespread moderate/high/very high particulate pollution recorded across England and Wales between on Saturday 3^rd March 2018, building from a moderate level of pollution recorded in the south east of England on Sunday 2^nd March 2018. This episode is also evident aas the highest particulate concentratiosn recorded at Heathrow during 2018. A change in wind direction on 1st March included a track from Eastern Europe which caused increased sulphate particles, indicative of particles from coal burning areas. Air tracks from then onwards included greater time over north western Europe and the UK and particle pollution increased showing contributions across the region from traffic, gas combustion and wood burning. Saturday brought an unexpected recirculation of air that had been over the UK on Friday.

Wood burning particles slowly increased from Thursday through to Sunday morning. The greatest concentrations from fresh local wood burning were seen on Saturday and Sunday evenings. This was not predicted by any of the forecasting services operating within the UK. This may be due to the unusual emissions patterns with day-long home heating and wood burning, which would not be captured in emissions inventories along with the formation of secondary particles from wood burning which is a topic of current research. A fresh westerly air flow caused a very sudden clearance of the particle pollution overnight into Sunday but there was still some local wood burning pollution in London on Sunday evening.

Figure 28: DAQI for 22nd November 2018

Moderate’ levels of PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 Particulate pollution were measured widely across London on Thursday 22nd November. Particulate levels began to rise markedly during the evening of Wednesday 21st as polluted incoming air which had previously passed at low altitude over Paris and the Calais region mixed with local emissions which were poorly dispersed in cold, settled conditions. This combination of factors continued throughout Thursday 22nd although the incoming air path changed during the day to import pollution from industrial and urbanised areas of Belgium, Holland and Germany. Particulate levels remained elevated into the morning of Friday 23rd, concentrations then started to fall from late morning as wind speeds increased slightly and improved dispersion.

4.9 Long term changes in pollutant concentrations

LHR2 has been in operation for 26 years (following installation in 1993). The other three sites have all been in operation since 2003 or earlier. There is now a considerable amount of data which can be used to assess how pollutant concentrations have changed over this period. Annual mean concentrations of NOx, NO, NO₂, PM₁₀, PM_2.5, and O₃ are illustrated In Figures 26 to 31 below. BC measurements only started in 2014. The amount of data is still considered not to be enough for this type of analyses, and therefore the BC time series for black carbon annual mean is not presented on this report. Annual means are only shown for years in which data capture was at least 75%. Also shown is the mean result from an average of up to seven urban non-roadside monitoring sites in London. These are: London Bexley, London Bloomsbury, London Eltham, London North Kensington, London Teddington, London Haringey and London Westminster.

NO₂

NO₂: Note that Harlington and Green Gates have the same concentrations for the last four years and the trace for London Harlington is behind the one for Green Gates. There was a clear decrease at LHR2 from 2003 to 2015 at the LHR2 site. However 2016 and 2017 saw increases in NO₂ concentration. The concentrations measured for 2018 have dropped back to 2015 levels. The only site where an increase in concentrations was measured was Oaks Road, however this was within the general average trend of concentrations at this site over the last 17 years. Overall the graph indicates a slow decrease in concentrations over the last 10 years.

Figure 29: Time series for annual mean NO2

NO

NO: Annual mean concentrations of total NO have generally decreased at LHR2 since it came into operation. There was a clear decrease throughout the 1990s at the LHR2 site although since the turn of the millennium the decreasing trend is less obvious with the annual mean fluctuating between approximately 33 μg m^-3 and 50 μg m^-3. At the other three sites, an overall decrease in annual mean NO has occurred during the period 2007-2015, although considerable variations have occurred from one year to the next. As reported during 2016 all the Heathrow sites and the London sites recorded the highest annual mean of this decade. This trend has reversed in 2017 and again in 2018 with concentrations reducing on those recorded during 2016.

Figure 30: Time series for annual mean NO

NO₂ as a % of NOx

NO₂ as a percentage of total NOx: From the early 1990s to about 2006 NO₂ accounted for an increasing percentage of total NOx at LHR2. Since then, it has fluctuated between 40% and 50%. The proportion of NOx measured as NO₂ at the other three sites has been consistently higher, but has followed broadly similar yearly variations to those seen at LHR2. This percentage seems to have stabilised in all sites since 2012 with a sharp decrease in 2016 but with subsequent increases in 2017 and 2018. This is also seen in the average of the other London sites.

Figure 31: Time series for annual mean NO₂ as a percentage of total NOx

PM_2.5

PM_2.5: For Green Gates and Oaks Road, where trends can be observed over many years, concentrations initially decreased and had remained stable since 2008/2009. 2017 saw a further reduction at both sites whilst 2018 saw a small increase at both sites. Concentrations at Harlington have been more erratic but this year as last year concentrations remain similar to the other Heathrow sites. Please note that London Harlington and Green Gates had the same average concentrations the last three years and so the Harlington line is not seen.

Figure 32: Time series for annual mean PM2.5

PM₁₀

PM₁₀: PM₁₀ data was measured with a TEOM up until 2013 (at Harlington there was a TEOM FDMS from 2009 to 2013). From then up until 2014 the data was VCM corrected. From 2014 onwards all data is from FIDAS instruments and therefore requires no correction factor. The annual means of PM₁₀ recorded in 2016 are similar to those recorded in 2015. However, a step change in the trend can be seen at all sites, which appears to coincide with the installation of the new Fidas analysers. Further to this the annual means of the four sites now all sit well below the other averaged London sites. A study of PM concentrations using FDMS and Fidas analysers was undertaken at Harlington, where over 30 months of co-located data is available for review. These studies concluded that annual mean Fidas and FDMS PM concentrations agree to within 1 μg m^-3 of each other.

Figure 33: Time series for annual mean PM10

O₃

O₃: Ozone was only measured at Harlington. A slight upward trend can be detected since measurements began. Annual means of NO and NO₂ have been slightly decreasing since 2013, which can probably indicate that ozone increase is caused by the reduction of concentration of combustion sources in the area, mainly NO - responsible for the fast consumption of O₃ to form NO₂. The balance of production and loss reactions combined with atmospheric air motion determines the global distribution of ozone on timescales of days to many months. A further possibility for the gradual increasing trend is a change in formation rate constants due to climate changes influence on factors such as temperature. The same trends can be seen at other London sites. The increase seen in 2018 will be strongly influenced by the long period of high ozone concentrations during June and July as discussed in Section 4.6.

Figure 34: Time series for annual mean Ozone at Harlington

4.10 Relationship with airport activity

In this section, the potential for correlation between airport activity and pollutant concentrations is investigated by comparing pollutant concentrations with Aircraft Transport Movements (ATM) at Heathrow from the Heathrow website (Travel Stats, 2018).

Figure 35 shows annual mean NOx concentrations at the four monitoring sites, together with annual total ATMs. ATMs rose steadily at Heathrow from 1995 to 2007, after which there was a decline until 2011. Since then, ATMs have remained steady at around 470,000. Local ambient concentrations in NOx have fluctuated over the same period, but there is no obvious relationship between NOx concentrations and airport activity. Figure 36 shows the same comparison for PM₁₀, with no clear relationship being apparent between annual mean PM₁₀ and changes in air transport movements. This does not mean that the airport is not a major contributor to local ambient PM₁₀, but suggests that variations in ambient PM₁₀ concentrations are also dependent on other factors. This simple analysis of air traffic movements indicates that annual variation in pollutant concentrations (i.e. the periods of high and low concentration) around Heathrow are influenced to a greater extent by general meteorological factors than by air traffic movement.

Figure 35: Time series for annual ATM and annual mean NOx concentrations

Figure 36: Time series for annual ATM and annual mean PM10 concentrations

5 Conclusions

The following conclusions have been drawn from the results of air quality monitoring around Heathrow Airport during 2018.

Oxides of nitrogen and particulate matter (as PM₁₀ and PM_2.5) were monitored throughout 2018 at four sites around Heathrow Airport (LHR2, London Harlington, Green Gates and Oaks Road). Ozone was measured at Harlington. BC was measured at LHR2 and Oaks Road. The conclusions of the 2018 monitoring programme are summarised below.

1. Data capture of at least 90% was achieved for all pollutants at all the monitoring sites except for black carbon at LHR2.
2. Oxides of nitrogen were monitored at all four sites. No sites exceeded the AQS objective of 200 μg m-3 for hourly mean NO₂ more than the 18 permitted times per year during 2018.
3. One site, LHR2, exceeded the annual mean AQS objective of 40 μg m^-3 for NO₂ in 2018, with an annual mean of 43 μg m^-3, although the EU limit values and AQS objectives do not apply at the LHR2 site, because it is within the airport boundary where there is no public exposure. The other three HAL sites did not exceed this objective.
4. All four sites met the AQS objective for 24-hour mean of 50 μg m^-3 (not to be exceeded more than 35 times a year) and annual mean of 40 μg m^-3 for PM₁₀. The particulate matter was measured using a FIDAS instrument with no correction required for PM₁₀. PM_2.5 data is divided by 1.06 to ensure gravimetric equivalence.
5. Ozone was measured at Harlington only, this site exceeded the AQS objective for ozone on 18 days during 2018 which was an exceedance of the AQS objective. A long period of elevated ozone across the region occurred from 23^rd June to 27^th July during which 8 of these exceedances occured.
6. Seasonal variations in pollutant concentrations at all sites were similar to those observed in previous years and at other urban background sites. Both NO, NO₂ and BC exhibited higher concentrations during the winter months. PM₁₀ and PM_2.5, which have both primary and secondary components, showed a much less pronounced seasonal pattern. Ozone levels were highest during the spring and summer, as is typical.
7. The diurnal patterns of concentrations of all pollutants were mostly typical of urban monitoring sites. Peak concentrations of NO, NO₂ and BC coincided with the morning and evening rush hour periods, and to lesser extent, particulates. Levels of ozone peaked in the afternoons.
8. Several periods of elevated PM₁₀ and PM_2.5 concentrations (daily mean concentration in the Defra “High” band) occurred during 2018. As in previous years, other urban background monitoring sites in London and the south east of England showed a similar pattern of elevated particulates concentrations during these periods. This indicates that the higher concentrations measured at Heathrow reflected regional variations in PM₁₀ concentration, rather than any emission sources specific to the airport.
9. Meteorological measurements are made at LHR2, allowing the effect of wind direction and speed to be investigated. The polar plots plotting hourly mean pollutant concentrations against the corresponding wind speed and wind direction shows significant source contribution from local traffic and potentially residential sources for NO₂, NO and BC. There is also contribution from the airport although this emissions source is less significant. PM concentrations are dominated by regional episodes as demonstrated by the by high concentrations from an easterly direction.
   
10. Mean concentrations of pollutants at the four Heathrow sites in 2018 were comparable with those measured at other suburban and urban background monitoring sites in London.
11. Long-term annual mean concentration data from this monitoring program show a gradual downward trajectory in levels of NO with some yearly variation. A small decrease is observed in annual mean concentrations of NO₂ at LHR2 for 2018 ending the upward trend seen since 2016. PM₁₀ measurements at Oaks Road and Green Gates increased slightly during 2018. O₃ concentrations continue to increase over time.
12. Neither seasonal patterns, nor long-term trends, in pollutant concentration at the Heathrow sites showed any obvious relationship to annual aircraft transport movements. Although the airport is likely to be a significant contributor to local air pollution, ambient concentrations are also influenced by meteorological and other factors.

6 References

Air Quality Expert Group, 2004. “Nitrogen Dioxide in the United Kingdom.” http://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/library/aqeg/publications.

Defra_1, 2009. “QA/QC Procedures for the UK Automatic and Urban Rural Air Quality Monitoring Network (AURN).” Department for Environment, Food; Rural Affairs; the Devolved Administrations. http://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/reports/cat13/0910081142_AURN_QA_QC_Manual_Sep_09_FINAL.pdf.

Defra_2, 2016. “Local Air Quality Management - Technical Guidance LAQM.TG (16).” Department for Environment, Food; Rural Affairs in partnership with the Scottish Executive, Welsh Assembly Government; Department of the Environment Northern Ireland. https://laqm.defra.gov.uk/documents/LAQM-TG16-April-16-v1.pdf.

Defra_3, 2017. “UK Informative Inventory Report (1990 to 2015).” Department for Environment, Food; Rural Affairs in partnership with the Scottish Executive, Welsh Assembly Government; Department of the Environment Northern Ireland. https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/assets/documents/reports/cat07/1703161205_GB_IIR_2017_Final_v1.0.pdf.

Defra_4, 2019. “UK-AIR.” UK-AIR, Air Quality Information Resource. Department for Environment, Food; Rural Affairs in partnership with the Scottish Executive, Welsh Assembly Government; Department of the Environment Northern Ireland. http://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/.

EC_1, 2008. “Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on Ambient Air Quality and Cleaner Air for Europe.” http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/50/oj/eng.

EC_2, 2015. “COMMISSION DIRECTIVE (EU) 2015/ 1480 - of 28 August 2015 - Amending Several Annexes to Directives 2004/ 107/ EC and 2008/ 50/ EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying down the Rules Concerning Reference Methods, Data Validation and Location of Sampling Points for the Assessment of Ambient Air Quality (Text with EEA Relevance).” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2015/1480/oj.

Environmental Research Group, 2019. “London Air Quality Network.” LAQN, London Air Quality Information Resource. https://www.londonair.org.uk.

Heathrow Airwatch, 2019. Heathrow Airwatch - Air Quality Information in the Heathrow Area. http://www.heathrowairwatch.org.uk/.

Travel Stats, 2018. Investor Centre Traffic Statistics Heathrow. https://www.heathrow.com/company/investor-centre/reporting/traffic-statistics.

Appendix I - Air Quality objectives and Index bands

Appendix II - Monitoring apparatus and techniques

Monitoring Equipment

The following continuous monitoring methods were used at the Heathrow air quality monitoring stations:

• NO, NO₂: chemiluminescence with ozone.
• PM₁₀ and PM_2.5: Fine Dust Analysis Systems (FIDAS).
  
• O₃: UV absorption analyser, Harlington only.
• Black Carbon (BC): Aethalometer, LHR2 and Oaks Road only.

These methods were selected in order to provide real-time data. The chemiluminescence and the UV absorption analysers are the European reference method for ambient NO₂ and O₃ monitoring.

Each analyser provides a continuous output, proportional to the pollutant concentration. This output is recorded and stored every 10 seconds, and averaged to 15 minute average values by the on-site data logger. This logger is connected to a modem and interrogated twice daily, by telephone, to download the data to Ricardo Energy & Environment. The data are then converted to concentration units and averaged to hourly mean concentrations.

The analysers for NOx and O₃ are equipped with an automatic calibration system, which is triggered daily under the control of the data logger. Fully certificated calibration gas cylinders are also used at each site for manual calibration.

Aethalometers quantify black carbon on filter samples based on the transmission of light through a sample. The sample is collected on a quartz tape, and the change in absorption coefficient of the sample is measured by a single pass transmission of light through the sample measured relative to a clean piece of filter. The aethalometers operate most commonly at two wavelengths, 880 nm and 370 nm. The 880 nm wavelength is used to measure the black carbon (BC) concentration of the aerosol, while the 370 nm wavelength gives a measure of the “UV component” of the aerosol.

The FIDAS unit employs a white light LED light scatter method that offers additional information on both particle size distribution from 0.18 to 30 microns (PM₁, PM_2.5, PM₄, PM₁₀ and Total Suspended Particles (TSP). This analyser has demonstrated equivalence to EN12341:2015, and is certified for use in UK monitoring networks under the MCERTS for UK PM certification scheme.

Appendix III - Quality assurance and Quality control

Ricardo Energy & Environment operates air quality monitoring stations within a tightly controlled and documented quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) system. These procedures are documented in the AURN QA/QC manual (Defra_1, 2009).

Elements covered within this system include: definition of monitoring objectives, equipment selection, and site selection, protocols for instrument operation calibration, service and maintenance, integrity of calibration gas standards, data review, scrutiny and validation.

All gas calibration standards used for routine analyser calibration are certified against traceable primary gas calibration standards at the Gas Standards Calibration Laboratory at Ricardo Energy & Environment. The calibration laboratory operates within a specific and documented quality system and has UKAS accreditation for calibration of the gas standards used in this survey.

An important aspect of QA/QC procedures is the regular six-monthly inter calibration and audit check undertaken at every monitoring site. This audit has two principal functions: firstly to check the instruments and the site infrastructure, and secondly to recalibrate the transfer gas standards routinely used on-site, using standards recently checked in the calibration laboratory. Ricardo Energy & Environment’s audit calibration procedures are UKAS accredited to ISO 17025.

In line with current operational procedures within the Defra AURN, full inter calibration audits take place at the end of winter and summer. At these visits, the essential functional parameters of the monitors such as noise, linearity and, for the NOx monitor, the efficiency of the NO₂ to NO converter are fully tested. In addition, the on-site transfer calibration standards are checked and re-calibrated if necessary, the air intake sampling system is cleaned and checked and all other aspects of site infrastructure are checked.

All air pollution measurements are reviewed daily by experienced staff at Ricardo Energy & Environment. Data are compared with corresponding results from AURN monitoring stations and with expected air pollutant concentrations under the prevailing meteorological conditions. This review process rapidly highlights any unusual or unexpected measurements, which may require further investigation. When such data are identified, attempts are made to reconcile the data against known or possible local air pollution sources or local meteorology, and to confirm the correct operation of all monitors. In addition, the results of the daily automatic instrument calibrations (see Appendix 2) are examined to identify any possible instrument faults. Should any faults be identified or suspected, arrangements are made for Ricardo Energy & Environment personnel or equipment service contractors to visit the site as soon as possible.

At the end of every quarter, the data for that period are reviewed to check for any spurious values and to apply the best daily zero and sensitivity factors, and to account for information which only became available after the initial daily processing. At this time, any data gaps are filled with data from the data logger back-up memory to produce as complete a data record as possible.

Finally, the data are re-examined on an annual basis, when information from the six-monthly inter calibration audits can be incorporated. After completion of this process, the data are fully validated and finalised, for compilation in the annual report.

Following these three-stage data checking and review procedures allows the overall accuracy and precision of the data to be calculated. The accuracy and precision figures for the pollutants monitored at Heathrow are summarised in Table 2.

All of the air quality monitoring equipment at both sites is housed in purpose-built enclosures. The native units of the analysers are volumetric (e.g. ppb). Conversion factors from volumetric to mass concentration measurement for gaseous pollutants are provided below:

• NO 1 ppb = 1.25 μg m^-3
• NO₂ 1 ppb = 1.91 μg m^-3

In this report, the mass concentration of NOx has been calculated as follows: NOx μg m^-3 = (NO ppb + NO₂ ppb) x 1.91.

This complies with the requirements of the Air Quality Directive and is also the convention generally adopted in air quality modelling (EC_1, 2008).

For further information, please contact:

Name	Nick Rand
Address	Ricardo Energy & Environment, Gemini Building, Harwell, Didcot, OX11 0QR, United Kingdom
Telephone	01235 753484
Email	nick.rand@ricardo.com